Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/ui to ^2.12.2 #8542

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 7, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/ui (source) ^2.12.1 -> ^2.12.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sanity-io/ui (@​sanity/ui)

v2.12.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2025 13:25
@renovate renovate bot requested review from RitaDias and removed request for a team February 7, 2025 13:25
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge February 7, 2025 13:25
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 7, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 7, 2025 1:33pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 7, 2025 1:33pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 7, 2025 1:33pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 7, 2025 1:33pm
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 7, 2025 1:33pm

@renovate renovate bot added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into next with commit b68186a Feb 7, 2025
37 of 40 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/sanity-ui-2.x branch February 7, 2025 13:26
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 42.45% 53812 / 126761
🔵 Statements 42.45% 53812 / 126761
🔵 Functions 47.94% 2772 / 5782
🔵 Branches 78.72% 10278 / 13056
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #30006 for commit 01806e8 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 7, 2025 1:37 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (1) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 4s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 21s 5 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 51s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 7s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 32s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 2s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 43s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Fri, 07 Feb 2025 13:38:48 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 23.8 efps (42ms) 23.8 efps (42ms) +0ms (-/-%)
article (body) 65.6 efps (15ms) 73.0 efps (14ms) -2ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 24.4 efps (41ms) 23.8 efps (42ms) +1ms (+2.4%)
article (string inside array) 21.7 efps (46ms) 21.3 efps (47ms) +1ms (+2.2%)
recipe (name) 47.6 efps (21ms) 45.5 efps (22ms) +1ms (+4.8%)
recipe (description) 52.6 efps (19ms) 50.0 efps (20ms) +1ms (+5.3%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (5ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) +1ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 17.4 efps (58ms) 17.9 efps (56ms) -2ms (-2.6%)
synthetic (string inside object) 17.4 efps (58ms) 19.2 efps (52ms) -6ms (-9.6%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 42ms 44ms 52ms 338ms 432ms 11.2s
article (body) 15ms 19ms 25ms 163ms 402ms 5.7s
article (string inside object) 41ms 43ms 49ms 287ms 435ms 7.4s
article (string inside array) 46ms 49ms 54ms 230ms 613ms 7.7s
recipe (name) 21ms 23ms 25ms 40ms 0ms 7.1s
recipe (description) 19ms 21ms 22ms 35ms 0ms 4.6s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 6ms 8ms 27ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 58ms 62ms 65ms 360ms 1747ms 14.3s
synthetic (string inside object) 58ms 61ms 73ms 467ms 1464ms 9.4s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 42ms 45ms 79ms 445ms 430ms 11.3s
article (body) 14ms 16ms 33ms 168ms 221ms 5.3s
article (string inside object) 42ms 44ms 53ms 308ms 444ms 7.4s
article (string inside array) 47ms 49ms 60ms 327ms 497ms 7.8s
recipe (name) 22ms 23ms 25ms 34ms 0ms 8.3s
recipe (description) 20ms 21ms 23ms 38ms 0ms 4.7s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 7ms 8ms 41ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 56ms 60ms 75ms 449ms 1346ms 14.9s
synthetic (string inside object) 52ms 56ms 62ms 442ms 1081ms 8.8s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

juice49 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant